Log in

No account? Create an account

Fri, Jan. 12th, 2007, 04:39 pm
evilgrins: Personally I say yes!

Was having one of my usual odd religious chats, sparked by my always bizarre religious posts, when this came up. Because of it, rather that going on into an extensively lengthy post (preamble is my family's genetic curse), I have one simple question for you.

Can God be sexy?

Sat, Jan. 13th, 2007 01:06 am (UTC)

how else can he have such a huge following?

Sat, Jan. 13th, 2007 01:31 am (UTC)

Depends on how you define "sexy"
Modern word usage gives it many different roles.
Clarify, please, my friend.

Tue, Jan. 16th, 2007 04:35 pm (UTC)

general broad based qualifier; the specifics lie on the side of the one answering

Sat, Jan. 13th, 2007 02:55 pm (UTC)

Tue, Jan. 16th, 2007 05:00 pm (UTC)

that's very wrong

Tue, Jan. 16th, 2007 07:57 pm (UTC)

I don't make this stuff up or approve of it.

I just share it.

Wed, Nov. 14th, 2007 12:25 am (UTC)

I don't think so. God has Love for us. Sex/y is for humans.

Fri, Jun. 6th, 2008 06:19 pm (UTC)
johng1960: Sexy God

Two part answer:
"Yes", God can be sexy, as in the usage of someone wanting to have sex with another person. Saying "I think you're sexy" has the built-in implication that I want to have sex with you. So, yes, I'm sure many people would LOVE to have sex with God.
But also "No", in the sense of someone who is "into" sex. Here's my reasoning: Despite all the religious propaganda to the contrary, the Judeo-Christian-Muslim God(same diety) does not have gender. "God" cannot have gender, because gender is useful for only one thig - procreation. With this in mind, remember that you can only procreate with one of your own kind. Since the prevailing dogma states that there is only one "God", then there is no possibility of procreation. If you cannot procreate you don't need gender; without gender you cannot have sex. At least if we truly are in "His" own image. Who knows, maybe "God" is actually an amoeba! Assexual.